- Chapter 9 presents possible new developments for contingency theory, to make it more coherent and, hopefully, valid. These new developments include the concepts of disequilibrium, quasi-fit and hetero-performance. All three are novel concepts that substantially revise and improve contingency theory.
- The Contingency Theory of Organizations. By Professor Lex Donaldson. Foundations for Organizational Science. Thanks for Sharing! You submitted the following rating and review. We'll publish them on our site once we've reviewed them.
- The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Download
- The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Template
- The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Answers
The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Download
The contingency theory of organizations, commonly known as the structural contingency theory (Donaldson, 2006), is an important framework used by management researchers to study organizational.
Catalogue Persistent Identifier
APA Citation
Donaldson, Lex. (2001). Abbott architect 1000 manual. The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif : Sage Publications
MLA Citation
Paterek manual. Donaldson, Lex. The contingency theory of organizations / Lex Donaldson Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, Calif 2001 How to patch cheat pcsx2 cheats.
Australian/Harvard Citation
Armstrong saxophone serial numbers. Donaldson, Lex. 2001, The contingency theory of organizations / Lex Donaldson Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, Calif
Wikipedia Citation
Please see Wikipedia's template documentation for further citation fields that may be required.
The contingency theory of organizations / Lex Donaldson
Bib ID | 2603682 | |
---|---|---|
Format | Book, Online - Google Books | |
Author |
| |
Description | Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications, c2001 xvi, 326 p. : ill. ; 24 cm. | |
ISBN | 0761915737 (alkaline paper) (cloth) 0761915745 (alkaline paper) (paperback) | |
Series | Ae92 workshop manual. Foundations for organizational science. | |
Full contents |
| |
Notes | Includes bibliographical references (p. 291-313) and index. | |
Subjects | Contingency theory (Management) |
In the Library
![The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free](https://heavenlybells.org/img/172905.png)
Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video .
Details | Collect From |
---|---|
NL 302.35 D676 Copy: hbk | Main Reading Room |
N 302.35 D676 Copy: hbk | Main Reading Room |
The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Template
Order a copy
Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary. |
To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video . |
The Contingency Theory Of Organizations Donaldson Pdf Free Answers
- Blau, P.M., and Schoenherr, P. A., 1971, The Structure of Organizations, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Burns, T., and Stalker, G. M., 1961, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
- Chandler, A.D. Jr., 1962, Strategy and Structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Caufield, C.C., 1989, An Integrative Research Review of the Relationship Between Technology and Structure: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa: Iowa City, Iowa.Google Scholar
- Child, J., 1975, Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance, Part 2: A contingency analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 12: 12–27.Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W., 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields, American Sociological Review, 48:147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W., Introduction. In Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, L., 1987, Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defence of contingency theory, Journal of Management Studies 24(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, L., 1995a (editor) Contingency Theory. Volume 9 in History of Management Thought Series, Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, L., 1995b American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, L., 1996 For Positivist Organization Theory: Proving the Hard Core, Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, L., 2001, The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
- Eccles, R.G., and Nohria N., 1992, Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
- Edwards, J.R. and Parry, M.E., 1993, On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1577–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fligstein, N., 1985, The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979,. American Sociological Review, 50: 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galunic, D.C., and Eisenhardt, K.M., 1994, Renewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 215–55.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, R.T., and Shergill, G.S., 1992, The relationship between strategy-structure fit and financial performance in New Zealand: Evidence of generality and validity with enhanced controls. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 95–113.Google Scholar
- Hunter, J.E., and Schmidt F.L., 2004, Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, Sage.Google Scholar
- Johns, G., 1981, Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27:443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keller, R.T., 1994, Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory, Academy of Management Journal, 37:167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kraatz, M.S., and Zajac E.J., 1992, Invisible Hand or Iron Cage? Market and Institutional Influence on Organizational Change.Google Scholar
- Meilich, O., 2003, Bivariate models of fit in contingency theory: Critique and a polynomial regression alternative, Paper to Academy of Management, Seattle.Google Scholar
- Merton, R.K., 1968, Social Theory and Social Structure, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J.W., Scott, W.R., Strang, D., and Creighton, A.L., 1988, Bureaucratization without Centralization: Changes in the Organizational System of U.S. Public Education, 1940–80, in: Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Lynne G. Zucker, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Miller, D., 1986, Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. StrategicManagement Journal, 7: 233–49.Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H., 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
- Palmer, I., and Dunford, R., 2002, Out with the old and in with the new? The relationship Between traditional and new organizational practices, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10: 209–225.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T., 1961, Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations, in: Complex Organizations: A Sociological Reader, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Amitai Etzioni, New York, pp. 32–47Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., 1982, Organizations and Organization Theory, Pitman, Marshfield.Google Scholar
- Priem, R.L., and Rosenstein, J., 2000, Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory, Organization Science, 11: 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, M., 2005, Contingent Corporate Governance: A Challenge to the Theories of Universal Board Structure. PhD Thesis, Australian Graduate School of Management, Universities of New South Wales and Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Scott, W. R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
- Van de Ven, A.H., and Robert D., 1985, The concept of fit in contingency theory, in: Research in Organizational Behaviour, 7, Edited by B.M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 333–65.Google Scholar
- Whittington, R., Mayer M., and Curto F., 1999, Chandlerism in post-war Europe: Strategic and structural change in France, Germany and the UK, 1950–1993, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8: 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woodward, J., 1965, Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar